🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy could be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to approve a proposal raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a good first step," commented one European lawmaker driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, support gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization founded by the family of a young person who died after encountering harmful online content contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some figures to follow this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international debate continues, the policies of this nation and its followers show that states around the world are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.