Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Compensation against Clearing House over Seized Assets
Russia's monetary authority has stated it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a clear warning from the Kremlin against plans to use immobilized Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.
The Legal Claim
Based on accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.
EU leaders will decide in the coming days on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.
Most of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.
Divergent Legal Views
EU authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.
The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any utilization of the funds as theft. It has warned of retaliatory actions, including confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.
Geopolitical Maneuvering
In comments interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."
The clearing house declined to comment on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.
"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that such assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm.
EU Countermeasures
European authorities said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. They are also crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."
The Proposed Loan Mechanism
According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.
Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict.
Other Funding Ideas
The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.
This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.
Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."